You are here

SSL

RC4, SSL, and deck chairs on the Titanic

ChromeChrome has sensibly increased the key sizes it expects in public-key transactions (see here and here). However, Chrome still silently accepts RC4 encryption, even though RC4 has been vulnerable to attack for over a decade. 

This is like putting a heavy padlock on a cardboard box.

Even so, 7 out of the top 10 US web sites still use RC4. This includes sites with a lot to lose like Amazon and eBay as well as Google itself. The other weaklings in the Top 10 are LinkedIn, Wikipedia, Twitter, and Google's Youtube (as weak as their owner).

Wordpress tag: 
Post category: 

Fraudulent Public-Key Certificates

We rely on public-key cryptography to authenticate software we download from the Internet, like software updates, some Web-based software, and many device drivers. When we try to install or run such software, the system may automatically check the signature and warn us if it is missing or suspect. The system checks the signature by referring to a public-key certificate associated with the vendor who signed the software.

So what happens if the public-key certificate is fraudulent?

For that matter, what makes a certificate fraudulent, and how would such a thing arise?

A certificate is fraudulent if the name it carries does not accurately reflect the person or entity that actually controls the associated public/private crypto keys. And yes, there have been several cases of fraudulent public-key certificates.

Post category: 

WordPress and OpenID Meet SSL

I've been trying to get these two to play nicely together for a while, and it looks as if Will Norris may have finally slain this here dragon. Will is the principal author of the Wordpress OpenID plugin.

In an ideal world, people never, ever disclose passwords on unprotected Internet connections. In general this means the server has to provide SSL support. However, you can sort of sidestep the problem by using OpenID. It's not perfect, but it addresses that particular vulnerability. (Revised 1/28)

Wordpress tag: 
Post category: 

Revising OpenID for WordPress

Will Norris is working on a revision to OpenID for WordPress. This is good, and I have some observations and suggestions. At the moment the OpenID plugin works pretty well - I have separate logins delegated through domains I own. I routinely log in through OpenID for both routine and administrative activities.
Post category: 

SSL with WordPress 2.6

This is more of a reminder to myself - you can enable SSL on WordPress, but it's essentially an undocumented feature. This afternoon all I could find was a forum posting on enabling SSL.

There doesn't seem to be genuine documentation on it in the Codex, at least, not documentation that pops out when you do a search.

Wordpress tag: 
Post category: 

Penalizing Unauthenticated SSL Certificates

Mozilla, like most responsible web browsers, pops up a warning if someone visits a secure web site where the site's crypto credentials have not been countersigned by a recognized certificate authority.

In Slashdot, Chandon Seldon arues that the Mozilla SSL Policy is Bad For the Web., which links to material by Nat Tuck saying, again, Mozilla SSL policy bad for the Web. The argument is that this policy violates net neutrality by forcing people into a commercial venue if they want their secure connections to be user friendly. The commentaries find this especially troublesome for nonprofit organizations.

This is nonsense. Net Neutrality is about connectivity. SSL is about security and assured identification. Web browsers pop up a complaint about authentication when they can't verify a site's identity - that's what the browser is supposed to do. SSL certificate management is the best affirmative defense in the Internet today and these suggestions will only weaken it.

Post category: 

Six Minute History of Information Security

I have been reading the ACM's Model Curriculum on Information Technology (a prototype "IT" major) with a special eye towards the information security coverage. I've been teaching information security courses and recently developed a major in the area.

The curriculum provides minimum times to cover major topics in the field, like 3 hours to cover "Fundamental Aspects" including the "history" of information assurance and security. After factoring out the other dozen 'learning outcomes' for that topic, one is left with six minutes to cover the "history" of information security.

Are 32,768 different keys enough?

This is one for the books. Several OpenSSL implementations, including Denbian and its children, including Ubuntu, have been crippled since September 2006. It's described on the metasploit web site.

The pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) was broken such that it only used the Unix process ID as the unchanging random input to the generator process. In other words, these security packages could not generate more than 32,768 different keys (since there were only 32,768 different process IDs on Unix).

Post category: 

SSL Site "Seal"

As noted earlier, I'm now using SSL to secure parts of my site. I used to have arrangements like that at Visi.com, my old ISP, but I'm making better use of it with WordPress and such.

Pages

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer